The Nacilbupera Guzzle

Whoever examines with attention the history of the dearths and famines … will find, I believe, that a dearth never has arisen from any combination among the inland dealers in corn, nor from any other cause but a real scarcity, occasioned sometimes perhaps, and in some particular places, by the waste of war, but in by far the greatest number of cases by the fault of the seasons; and that a famine has never arisen from any other cause but the violence of government attempting, by improper means, to remedy the inconveniences of a dearth. (Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations IV.5.44)

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Professor Obama's Lecture at the State of the Union Shows He Still Doesn't Get It

Tonight in his lengthy, professorial lecture Obama reiterated support for the two biggest bills Nacilbupera and Americans opposed this year: Cap N Tax (IE "Climate Change Bill"/Waxman-Markey/"Cap N Trade") and the Democare healthcare scheme. If anyone was in any doubts of whether a Brown victory in MA was enough to pull Obama towards the middle, those doubts have been erased. The State of our Union is bad and Obama doesn't know how to fix it. Worse, he ignores the will of the people in opposing these schemes and taxes.

Obama also reiterated his lie to the American people about creating (or saving) 2 million jobs when the facts are he has lost 4 million in his first year as president.

In a show of bombastic maneuvering, he advocated that federal government workers be given preferential treatment in student loan forgiveness over private sector workers. (Sounds rather unconstitutional let alone anti-business, pro government bureaucracy).

He proposed a super-lite freeze of spending of selected budget items at what are now unsustainable, record levels. The funniest line of all showing how minuscule importance he takes on cutting the deficit was this:
"I know that some in my own party will argue that we cannot address the deficit or freeze government spending when so many are still hurting. I agree, which is why this freeze will not take effect until next year..."

Nacilbupera broke out in hysterical ROFL at the pathetic-ness of an Obama fiscally-responsible budget and complete lack of courage to stand up for the smallest of all budget cutting ideas.

In contrast, Nacilbupera feels the president should proposed a balanced budget. Cut the czars, eliminated the Dept of Education, cut entitlements, cut, cut, cut! Cut before our country goes bankrupt! But no, says Obama. That might hurt. It might cause pain and hardship. Obama will propose a budget $1T again out of whack this year again. Unsustainable. Imagine the pain, Mr. President, you will cause when hyperinflation destroys our country due to unmanageable debt.

You are a fiscal disaster and disgrace to our country, Obama. Shame on you! Perhaps more than any single item we are looking for in a 2012 Presidential Candidate is one who will propose from day one a budget that AT MINIMUM holds the line on the deficit until the economy turns around and we can use annual surpluses to reduce our national debt and pay back the Chinese.


Video: Justice Alito lips "Simply Not True" at Obama's SCOTUS shot (Moonbattery)


Gerry said...

You offhandedly state "the facts" without supplying a single link to back them up.

Perhaps you're just jealous he speaks like an intelligent person, and you write like a complete moron.

Let's see some links! Back up your conclusions!

nacilbupera said...


Apparently you're not a regular reader of this blog? You are correct: this particular entry did not contain links but we have in past entries provided good documentation of the facts. Time constraints prohibit us from doing more.

We have provided facts when they are in doubt, but you offer vague resistance to the facts as we present them. If you care to challenge us on any fact, be specific and we'll back it up. We have no plans to document facts you can verify through your own research.

To suggest we are jealous of Obama is a ridiculous ad hominem attack. Furthermore, Nacilbupera has never attack Obama's intelligence (we find him cunning which conveys intelligence), only his utter lack of leadership, incompetence in decision-making, mockery of the Constitution, and dearth of truth-telling. To state “[we] write like a complete moron” is an opinion you are entitled to, yet we could turn the tables and ask you to "back up your conclusions" and cite some moron-ish links. It appears to us your conclusion contains a double standard.